The ‘Delhi Chalo’ protest led by agitating farmers is set to escalate starting from Wednesday, as their talks with the Government continue to be deadlocked. Despite multiple rounds of dialogue, both sides remain firm in their positions, making it unlikely for the stalemate to be resolved quickly. The farmers’ primary demand revolves around securing legal guarantees for a minimum support price (MSP) across all crops, along with unrestricted procurement of 23 key crops under MSP. They also seek complete debt forgiveness for farmers and farm laborers, as well as a reversal of policies that are perceived as detrimental to their interests. The implementation of crop prices in accordance with the recommendations of the Dr MS Swaminathan Commission’s report is crucial to their demands. Furthermore, the farmers are advocating for the extension of pensions to both farmers and farm workers, as well as a waiver on any increase in electricity tariffs. They also insist on the nationwide enforcement of the Land Acquisition Act of 2013. In terms of international trade, they are calling for India’s withdrawal from the World Trade Organization (WTO) and a halt to all Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). While opinions may vary on their demands, it is important to note that they are not unconstitutional. In the latest development, the farmers have rejected the Government’s offer regarding the MSP, which has prompted the resumption of the ‘Delhi Chalo’ march. Despite being presented as a goodwill gesture, the farmers perceive the MSP offer as inadequate and lacking concrete assurances. They remain skeptical about the absence of legal guarantees and the potential deregulation that could eventually lead to the dismantling of the MSP system, despite assurances from the Government.The ‘Delhi Chalo’ march gained momentum in 2020 as farmers gathered near Delhi to oppose farm laws. The protest received widespread support, highlighting the seriousness of the issues. The decision to recommence the march shows the farmers’ determination. However, the government’s approach of fortifying the capital is not democratic. Dialogue should be pursued instead of confrontation. The farmers must follow the laws, but the government should address their grievances. Considering some of the farmers’ demands would create a conducive environment for discussions. Both sides must engage in constructive dialogue to find a solution. All stakeholders should prioritize the nation’s interests for a just resolution.

Promotional | NE India Writing Star Contest