Addressing the Manipur issue during one of his election rallies, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has asserted that “timely intervention” by both the Centre and the State Government played a crucial role in improving the situation. However, the statement begs a thorough assessment as the crisis resulted in the loss of several lives and property and led to the Opposition’s criticism of the two Governments being impervious to the situation. Manipur has lived through various socio-political issues, including ethnic tensions, insurgency and demands for greater autonomy. This has led to a long military presence in the State, much to the consternation of the locals. The latest crisis erupted due to communal clashes and the subsequent violence exacerbated the existing challenges. Modi’s assertion of timely intervention implies that the Government actions were prompt and effective in addressing the crisis. Indeed, the intervention of security forces and the deployment of additional troops might have helped restore law and order to some extent. Moreover, the coordination between the Centre and the State Government in deploying resources and initiating dialogue could have contributed to de-escalating tensions. Both the Centre and the State had the BJP Government, so the coordination was swift. However, ground reality suggests a more nuanced but different picture. The recurring nature of crisis in Manipur indicates underlying systemic issues that require comprehensive solutions; merely addressing the symptoms is unlikely to yield lasting peace.

 The Prime Minister is right when he says that action was taken swiftly. Indeed, the Army was called in but what it did is a different story. Reports of alleged excesses during the crisis and selective action raised concerns about accountability and the protection of civilian lives. The role of political leadership in fostering inclusive dialogue and addressing the concerns of all stakeholders is paramount in resolving conflicts. While the Government’s intervention may have focused on restoring order, the efficacy of broader reconciliation efforts and addressing community grievances remains questionable. Furthermore, the assessment of the Government’s response should also consider the rehabilitation and compensation measures. The loss of lives and property entails a moral obligation on the part of the Government to provide adequate support and assistance to the affected individuals. Home Minister Amit Shah did visit the State when it was burning and tried to facilitate dialogue between the warring factions, albeit with limited success. The Prime Minister’s on-site absence was conspicuous. With his compelling speeches, he might have helped quell the escalating turmoil. Unfortunately, he chose not to. While Modi’s assertion might hold some truth in terms of immediate crisis management, a long-term action plan is missing to date. Sustained efforts towards addressing underlying grievances, promoting dialogue, ensuring accountability and fostering inclusive development are imperative for achieving lasting peace and stability in Manipur.